Pemphigoid Gestationis  Herpes

 

 

Gestationis

 

 

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Pemphigoid gestationis (PG) is the least common, yet best-characterized, dermatitis specific to pregnancy. It classically presents as an intensely itchy, urticarial rash during the later part of pregnancy or the immediate postpartum period, then rapidly progresses to a pemphigoid-like, vesiculo-bullous eruption. The rash may wax and wane during pregnancy, only to flare during labor and delivery. PG appears to be mediated by a specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) directed against the cutaneous basement membrane zone (BMZ).

PG occurs in approximately 1 in 50,000 pregnancies. It is associated with HLA-DR3 and DR4, and it appears likely that the incidence in various ethnic groups parallels the frequency of these genes in different populations.

ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS

PG appears to be caused by an anti-BMZ antibody that induces C3 deposition along the dermal-epidermal junction. The PG autoantibody is an IgG that is infrequently found by direct immunofluorescence (IF), although indirect, complement-added IF reveals the circulating IgG in the majority of patients. In salt-split skin, staining remains with the epidermal fragment. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the PG antibody is now commercially available, and when this highly sensitive test is used, antibody titers appear to correlate with disease activity. The PG autoantibody belongs to the IgG1 subclass and fixes complement via the classical complement pathway. T cells also show selective NC16A reactivity in PG, although their role in disease development remains to be elucidated.

Nearly all patients with PG [and most patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP)] have demonstrable antibodies to BP180 (type XVII collagen), a 180-kd transmembrane protein with its N-terminal end embedded within the intracellular component of the hemidesmosome and its C-terminal end located extracellularly (see Chap. 51). The extracellular section contains a series of 15 collagenous components alternating with 16 short, non-collagenous domains. The sixteenth non-collagenous segment closest to the plasma membrane of the basal keratinocyte is designated NC16A and contains the immunoreactive site. The PG autoantibody is assumed to be pathogenic for several reasons: (1) It is found in essentially all patients. (2) In vitro, purified antibodies to BP180 from patients with BP cause chemoattraction to the dermal-epidermal junction with subsequent degranulation and dermal-epidermal separation. (3) Rabbit antibodies to BP180 in animal models induce sub-epidermal blisters when infused into neonatal mice or hamsters.

The BP180 protein differs significantly from the BP230 protein recognized by the majority of BP sera. The 230-kd protein is coded for on the short arm of chromosome 6.¹⁵ Its complementary DNA (cDNA) has been sequenced¹⁶ and codes for an intracellular protein¹⁷ that shows considerable homology with desmoplakin I.¹⁸ The 180-kd protein is coded for on the long arm of chromosome 10.¹⁹ Its cDNA shows no homology with the 230-kd cDNA but rather encodes a protein with two domains showing the primary structure of tri-helical collagen.

        

What initiates the production of autoantibody remains unclear, but because gestational pemphigoid is exclusively a disease of pregnancy, attention has focused

on immunogenetics and potential cross-reactivity between placental tissue and skin.

Immunogenetic studies reveal an increase in HLA antigens DR3 or DR4, and curiously, nearly 50 percent of patients have the simultaneous presence of both.²¹ The extended haplotype HLA-A1, B8, DR3 is known to be in linkage disequilibrium with a deletion of C4A (the C4 null allele or C4QO). Indeed, 90 percent of patients have either a C4AQO or a C4BQO.²² Whether the C4QO association is the primary genetic marker for PG or whether the presence of a C4QO is even clinically relevant to complement function, however, remains to be shown.

It is worth noting that patients with neither DR3 nor DR4 may have clinically indistinguishable disease; the presence of the characteristic HLA antigens alone is not sufficient to produce disease.

Essentially, 100 percent of women with a history of PG have demonstrable anti-HLA antibodies. Because the only source of disparate HLA antigens is typically the placenta (which is primarily of paternal origin), the universal finding of anti-HLA antibodies implies a high frequency of immunologic insult during gestation. Indeed, a slight increase in HLA-DR2 in the husbands of women with PG has been reported.²³ It has been suggested that immunologically primed women may simply react more strongly to tissue with disparate HLA antigens. Whether anti-HLA antibodies represent phenomenon or epiphenomenon, remains to be clarified.

The autoantibody of gestational pemphigoid binds to amniotic basement membrane, a structure derived from fetal ectoderm and antigenically similar to skin.^25,26 Women with PG also show an increased expression of major histocompatibility complex class II antigens (DR, DP, DQ) within the villous stroma of chorionic villi but not skin. It has therefore been proposed that PG is a disease initiated by the aberrant expression of major histocompatibility complex class II antigens (of paternal haplotype) within the placenta that serves to initiate an allogeneic response to placental BMZ, which then cross-reacts with skin.

On the other hand, PG has also been reported in association with hydatidiform moles³⁰ and choriocarcinomas.³¹ This is an intriguing clinical observation, because most hydatidiform moles are produced by a diploid contribution of paternal chromosomes and contain neither fetal tissue nor amnion. There are no case reports of a PG-like rash in males with choriocarcinoma. Unlike its counterpart in women, choriocarcinoma in males is strictly syngeneic tissue. Because choriocarcinoma in women is entirely derived from placental tissue (which is largely of paternal derivation), the suggestion is that the development of PG is somehow dependent on the state of partial allograph, not necessarily on the presence of amnion.

 CLINICAL FINDINGS

PG is exclusively associated with pregnancy. It typically presents during late pregnancy with the abrupt onset of intensely pruritic urticarial lesions. Fifty percent of patients experience first onset on the abdomen, often within or immediately adjacent to the umbilicus. The other half present with typical lesions, but in an atypical distribution (extremities, palms, or soles). Rapid progression to a generalized, pemphigoid-like eruption, sparing only the face, mucous membranes, palms, and soles is the rule (although any site may be involved). Flares occur with delivery in approximately 75 percent of patients and may be dramatic. The explosive onset of blistering may occur within hours of delivery, either as a flare of pre-existing disease or as presentation de novo. Up to one-quarter of patients initially present during the immediate postpartum period.

Newborns may be affected up to 10 percent of the time, but the disease is typically mild and self-limited. IF of newborn skin may yield positive findings despite a lack of clinically apparent disease, which suggests that more than C3 deposition alone is required to induce lesions.³²

Because of clinical and IF similarities with BP, and because of the considerable confusion over the term herpes gestationis (particularly outside dermatology), most authors have accepted the revised terminology of PG.³³ However, there are several differences worth bearing in mind: (1) BP is a disease of the elderly and shows no gender bias. PG is exclusively associated with pregnancy. (2) PG shows a strong association with HLA-DR3, -DR4, and a C4 null allele. BP does not. (3) Indirect IF in BP yields positive results in the majority of patients, and the titer of anti-BMZ antibody is often high. The titer of anti-BMZ antibody in PG is usually so low that antibody cannot be detected without the use of complement-added or ELISA techniques. (4) The majority of BP sera react to an intracellular 230- to 240-kd component of the hemidesmosome. Sera from most PG patients react to a 180-kd transmembrane protein with a collagenous domain coded for on a different chromosome. Until such time as nosology is driven by pathologic mechanism instead of clinical observation, naming is likely to remain fungible.

Cutaneous Lesions

The typical lesions of PG are urticarial or arcuate plaques that rapidly progress toward a mixed dermatitis, including tense, pemphigoid-like blisters . Blisters may arise within urticarial plaques or on otherwise normal-appearing skin. Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy  can show microvesiculation but not the tense, sub-epidermal blisters of PG.

Related Physical Findings

PG is seen exclusively in women and only in the presence of pregnancy (or trophoblastic tissue). Any other setting is inconsistent with this diagnosis.

LABORATORY TESTS

Results of routine laboratory investigations are normal. Histopathology classically reveals a sub-epidermal vesicle with a perivascular infiltrate of lymphocytes and eosinophils . Eosinophils may be lined up along the dermal-epidermal junction and typically fill the vesicular space. Classic findings, however, are seen only in the minority of cases. A nonspecific mixed cellular infiltrate containing a variable number of

eosinophils is more common. The presence of eosinophils is the most constant feature of PG.

Special Tests

The sine qua non for a diagnosis of PG is the finding of C3, with or without IgG, in a linear band along the BMZ of perilesional skin . In salt-split skin specimens, antibody deposition is found along the bottom of the epidermal fragment, a finding similar to that seen in BP. Indirect IF only occasionally detects circulating IgG deposition. However, complement-added indirect IF reveals the circulating anti-BMZ IgG in nearly all patients. The PG ELISA now available will likely replace IF.

Anti-BMZ antibody titers correlate with the extent and severity of disease, but only if ELISA tests are used.⁵ There is no apparent correlation between HLA type and clinical activity.²¹ An increased incidence of antithyroid antibodies has been documented, but clinically apparent thyroid dysfunction appears rare.³⁴ Antinuclear antibodies are not seen, and serum complement levels are normal.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

Since early lesions of PG can be urticarial, the most frequent frustration is differentiating PG from pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy, otherwise known as polymorphous eruption of pregnancy . PG usually progresses rapidly, which makes the clinical diagnosis apparent. Allergic contact dermatitis and drug eruptions might also be difficult to distinguish. Where doubt exists, IF (or ELISA) is the key to differentiation and is particularly relevant in helping patients plan for future pregnancies .

COMPLICATIONS

No increase in maternal morbidity or mortality has been documented, although the impression of such an increase remains from a review of individual case reports. Cutaneous disease in the newborn is typically self-limited and rarely requires intervention. Although there is an increased risk of premature and small-for-gestational-age births, there are no data to suggest that treatment with systemic corticosteroids alters the risk of premature delivery. That being the case, it is imperative that the risks of therapy be balanced against the severity of the symptoms.

Women with a history of PG appear to be at increased risk for the subsequent development of Graves disease.

PROGNOSIS AND CLINICAL COURSE

The clinical presentation and course of disease may be extremely variable. Many patients experience spontaneous resolution during the later part of gestation only to experience a flare, sometimes dramatically, at the time of delivery. Others develop relatively trivial urticarial lesions during one pregnancy, only to suffer characteristic blistering during a subsequent gestation. Still others develop classic disease during one pregnancy, then no disease during the next. The frequency of such “skip pregnancies” approximates 5 percent to 10 percent. Recurrences associated with menstruation are common, and flares during the subsequent use of oral contraceptives occur in at least 25 percent of patients.

Most disease spontaneously remits over weeks to months following delivery, although there are isolated reports of protracted postpartum involvement. It has often been said that once gestational pemphigoid develops, it tends to occur earlier and with greater severity during subsequent gestations, but there are no data to support this contention.

No clear pattern of paternal contribution, if there is one, has yet been elucidated. First onset during both primiparous and multiparous pregnancies has been reported, with and without a change in partners.

 Differential Diagnosis of Pemphigoid Gestationis

Most Likely

• ·         Urticarial pemphigoid gestationis
• ·         Pruritic urticarial papules and plaques of pregnancy
• ·         Other eruptions of pregnancy
• ·         Contact dermatitis
• ·         Drug eruption

Consider

• ·         Urticaria
• ·         Erythema multiforme
• ·         Dermatitis herpetiformis

Rule Out

• ·         Pemphigus vulgaris
• ·         Varicella

TREATMENT

Gestational pemphigoid is sufficiently rare that no controlled studies are available. Nonetheless, there is general consensus that treatment with topical corticosteroids and antihistamines is ineffective. Systemic corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy. Most patients respond to 0.5 mg/kg of prednisone (prednisolone) daily. Maintenance therapy, generally at a lower dosage, may or may not be required throughout gestation. As noted earlier, many patients experience spontaneous disease regression during the third trimester, only to experience flare during parturition.

In individual cases, alternatives to corticosteroids (dapsone, pyridoxine, cyclosporine) or adjuvants (gold, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis) have been tried. None, with the possible exception of cyclosporine, is useful prior to term, and the experience with each has been variable at best. There are obvious concerns with the use of any of these alternatives during pregnancy.

PREVENTION

Only a small percentage of women who express DR3, DR4, or the combination of DR3 and DR4 ever develop PG, and the role of the paternal tissue in the development of disease (if any) is far from clear. With no predictive test available, prevention is not possible.

Those with a history of PG face the likelihood (but not the assurance) of recurrent involvement during subsequent gestations and are likely to develop symptoms during the use of oral contraceptives. Women who have experienced PG need not avoid additional pregnancies. They should, however, be counseled that recurrent disease is the rule.